landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org

RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee

View all threads

[RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

CH
Chuck Hoskin
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 2:46 PM

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CEF716.96EE8BC0] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CEF716.96EE8BC0] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163
CR
Carlos R. Arias
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 2:56 PM

Chuck:

The attached legal concurrence in a discrimination complaint to the FCHR should provide good guidance as to reasonable accommodations of no pet rules for therapy dogs.

Best regards,

Carlos R. Arias
Clayton & McCulloh
1065 Maitland Center Commons Blvd.
Maitland, Florida 32751
Tel: (407)-875-2655
Fax: (407)-875-3363
Clayton & McCulloh now accepts credit cards.  Please go to www.clayton-mcculloh.comhttp://www.clayton-mcculloh.com/ and click on the "Online Payments" tab.
In compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please be advised that this law firm is acting as a debt collector and that the above mentioned may be attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.

From: Chuck Hoskin [mailto:CHoskin@esclaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

Chuck: The attached legal concurrence in a discrimination complaint to the FCHR should provide good guidance as to reasonable accommodations of no pet rules for therapy dogs. Best regards, Carlos R. Arias Clayton & McCulloh 1065 Maitland Center Commons Blvd. Maitland, Florida 32751 Tel: (407)-875-2655 Fax: (407)-875-3363 Clayton & McCulloh now accepts credit cards. Please go to www.clayton-mcculloh.com<http://www.clayton-mcculloh.com/> and click on the "Online Payments" tab. In compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please be advised that this law firm is acting as a debt collector and that the above mentioned may be attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose. From: Chuck Hoskin [mailto:CHoskin@esclaw.com] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163
CH
Chuck Hoskin
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 2:59 PM

Thanks.

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

[cid:image001.png@01CEF718.802335B0]

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Carlos R. Arias
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:56 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Chuck:

The attached legal concurrence in a discrimination complaint to the FCHR should provide good guidance as to reasonable accommodations of no pet rules for therapy dogs.

Best regards,

Carlos R. Arias
Clayton & McCulloh
1065 Maitland Center Commons Blvd.
Maitland, Florida 32751
Tel: (407)-875-2655
Fax: (407)-875-3363
Clayton & McCulloh now accepts credit cards.  Please go to www.clayton-mcculloh.comhttp://www.clayton-mcculloh.com/ and click on the "Online Payments" tab.
In compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please be advised that this law firm is acting as a debt collector and that the above mentioned may be attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.

From: Chuck Hoskin [mailto:CHoskin@esclaw.com]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CEF718.802335B0] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

Thanks. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 [cid:image001.png@01CEF718.802335B0] From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Carlos R. Arias Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 8:56 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Chuck: The attached legal concurrence in a discrimination complaint to the FCHR should provide good guidance as to reasonable accommodations of no pet rules for therapy dogs. Best regards, Carlos R. Arias Clayton & McCulloh 1065 Maitland Center Commons Blvd. Maitland, Florida 32751 Tel: (407)-875-2655 Fax: (407)-875-3363 Clayton & McCulloh now accepts credit cards. Please go to www.clayton-mcculloh.com<http://www.clayton-mcculloh.com/> and click on the "Online Payments" tab. In compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please be advised that this law firm is acting as a debt collector and that the above mentioned may be attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose. From: Chuck Hoskin [mailto:CHoskin@esclaw.com] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CEF718.802335B0] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163
LJ
Lainie J. Simon
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 3:23 PM

At the Boyer Institute this year, the speaker said that basically there is no such thing as a pet free building any more.  Examples included a basset hound "stress dog," yappy nippy yorkie "stress dogs" and the like.  And dogs over 20 lbs in small dog buildings.  The dogs don't need any special training or certification.  They just need some kind of doctor letter, which is $65 on the web.

Good luck.

On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hoskin wrote:

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant’s request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a “therapy dog” in an apartment complex that is “no pets”.

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete<image001.png> this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163


landten mailing list
landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten

Lainie J. Simon, Esq.
185 NW Spanish River Boulevard
Suite 220
Boca Raton, FL  33431
561.445.1361
561.997.6224(fax)

PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the party or parties addressed and named in this message. This communication and all attachments, if any, are intended to be and to remain confidential, and it may be subject to the applicable attorney - client and or work product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. Do not deliver, distribute, or copy this message and or any attachments if you are not the intended recipient. Do not disclose the contents or take any action in reliance upon the information contained in this communication or any attachments. Although this E-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the  responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for damage arising in any way from its use.
Ê

At the Boyer Institute this year, the speaker said that basically there is no such thing as a pet free building any more. Examples included a basset hound "stress dog," yappy nippy yorkie "stress dogs" and the like. And dogs over 20 lbs in small dog buildings. The dogs don't need any special training or certification. They just need some kind of doctor letter, which is $65 on the web. Good luck. On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hoskin wrote: > Does anyone have any insight on a tenant’s request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a “therapy dog” in an apartment complex that is “no pets”. > > Thanks. > > Chuck Hoskin > Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon > 30 South Spring Street > Pensacola, FL 32502 > > > This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete<image001.png> this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. > > Charles P. Hoskin > Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 > Fax: 850-434-7163 > > _______________________________________________ > landten mailing list > landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org > http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten Lainie J. Simon, Esq. 185 NW Spanish River Boulevard Suite 220 Boca Raton, FL 33431 561.445.1361 561.997.6224(fax) PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the party or parties addressed and named in this message. This communication and all attachments, if any, are intended to be and to remain confidential, and it may be subject to the applicable attorney - client and or work product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. Do not deliver, distribute, or copy this message and or any attachments if you are not the intended recipient. Do not disclose the contents or take any action in reliance upon the information contained in this communication or any attachments. Although this E-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for damage arising in any way from its use. Ê
HW
Heist, Weisse & Wolk
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 3:23 PM

Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these
cases.

http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1

Harry

LAW OFFICES OF
HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.com http://www.evict.com/
Email: harry@evict.com

THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND
INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR
DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing
law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment
complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin

Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon

30 South Spring Street

Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain
legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use
of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is
strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic
mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then deletecid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40
this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases. http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1 Harry LAW OFFICES OF HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A. PH: 1 800 253 8428 FAX: 1 800 367 9038 "Serving the Property Management Professional" Website: www.evict.com <http://www.evict.com/> Email: harry@evict.com THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY. ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then deletecid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40 this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163
CH
Chuck Hoskin
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 3:50 PM

Thanks.

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

[cid:image001.png@01CEF71F.A18EF2F0]

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases.

http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1

Harry

LAW OFFICES OF
HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.comhttp://www.evict.com/
Email: harry@evict.commailto:harry@evict.com
THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CEF71F.A18EF2F0] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

Thanks. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 [cid:image001.png@01CEF71F.A18EF2F0] From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases. http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1 Harry LAW OFFICES OF HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A. PH: 1 800 253 8428 FAX: 1 800 367 9038 "Serving the Property Management Professional" Website: www.evict.com<http://www.evict.com/> Email: harry@evict.com<mailto:harry@evict.com> THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY. ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CEF71F.A18EF2F0] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163
CH
Chuck Hoskin
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 3:51 PM

Thanks.

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

[cid:image001.png@01CEF71F.B8EF2410]

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Lainie J. Simon
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:23 AM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

At the Boyer Institute this year, the speaker said that basically there is no such thing as a pet free building any more.  Examples included a basset hound "stress dog," yappy nippy yorkie "stress dogs" and the like.  And dogs over 20 lbs in small dog buildings.  The dogs don't need any special training or certification.  They just need some kind of doctor letter, which is $65 on the web.

Good luck.

On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hoskin wrote:

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete<image001.png> this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163


landten mailing list
landten@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten

Lainie J. Simon, Esq.
185 NW Spanish River Boulevard
Suite 220
Boca Raton, FL  33431
561.445.1361
561.997.6224(fax)

PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the party or parties addressed and named in this message. This communication and all attachments, if any, are intended to be and to remain confidential, and it may be subject to the applicable attorney - client and or work product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. Do not deliver, distribute, or copy this message and or any attachments if you are not the intended recipient. Do not disclose the contents or take any action in reliance upon the information contained in this communication or any attachments. Although this E-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the  responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for damage arising in any way from its use.
Ê

Thanks. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 [cid:image001.png@01CEF71F.B8EF2410] From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Lainie J. Simon Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:23 AM To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule At the Boyer Institute this year, the speaker said that basically there is no such thing as a pet free building any more. Examples included a basset hound "stress dog," yappy nippy yorkie "stress dogs" and the like. And dogs over 20 lbs in small dog buildings. The dogs don't need any special training or certification. They just need some kind of doctor letter, which is $65 on the web. Good luck. On Dec 12, 2013, at 9:46 AM, Chuck Hoskin wrote: Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete<image001.png> this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 _______________________________________________ landten mailing list landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org> http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landten Lainie J. Simon, Esq. 185 NW Spanish River Boulevard Suite 220 Boca Raton, FL 33431 561.445.1361 561.997.6224(fax) PRIVILEGE AND CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This e-mail is covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 2510-2521 and is legally privileged. The contents of this e-mail message and any attachments are intended solely for the party or parties addressed and named in this message. This communication and all attachments, if any, are intended to be and to remain confidential, and it may be subject to the applicable attorney - client and or work product privileges. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message and its attachments. Do not deliver, distribute, or copy this message and or any attachments if you are not the intended recipient. Do not disclose the contents or take any action in reliance upon the information contained in this communication or any attachments. Although this E-mail and any attachments are believed to be free of any virus or other defect that might affect any computer system into which it is received and opened, it is the responsibility of the recipient to ensure that it is virus free and no responsibility is accepted by the sender for damage arising in any way from its use. Ê
DD
David D Eastman
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 4:03 PM

These two guidance memoranda by HUD and the Department of Justice may
provide good information and guidance to you.

David D. Eastman, Esq.

Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman, Gabel & Lee

2155 Delta Boulevard, Suite 210-B

Tallahassee, Florida 32303

(850) 521-0890

(850) 521-0891 Facsimile

The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the
personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named
above.  This transmission may be attorney-client work product or
communication and as such is privileged and confidential.  If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that you have received this document in error, and any review,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this
information is strictly prohibited.  If you received this communication
in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and e-mail the
original transmission to us.  Thank you.

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:51 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Thanks.

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain
legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by
electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and
all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [
mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse
& Wolk
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these
cases.

http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1

Harry

LAW OFFICES OF
HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.com http://www.evict.com/
Email: harry@evict.com

THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND
INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR
DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [
mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair
Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an
apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin

Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon

30 South Spring Street

Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain
legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the
use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination,
distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error,
please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by
electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and
all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

These two guidance memoranda by HUD and the Department of Justice may provide good information and guidance to you. David D. Eastman, Esq. Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman, Gabel & Lee 2155 Delta Boulevard, Suite 210-B Tallahassee, Florida 32303 (850) 521-0890 (850) 521-0891 Facsimile The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This transmission may be attorney-client work product or communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and e-mail the original transmission to us. Thank you. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:51 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Thanks. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [ mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases. http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1 Harry LAW OFFICES OF HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A. PH: 1 800 253 8428 FAX: 1 800 367 9038 "Serving the Property Management Professional" Website: www.evict.com <http://www.evict.com/> Email: harry@evict.com THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY. ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [ mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163
ML
Martin Lawyer
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 6:56 PM

My only addition to what others have said and cited is to emphasize that the "protected category" in the U.S. Fair Housing Act is not "disability".  It is "handicap".  The standards and rights in the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act are very different.

I attach and paste below the operative provisions from the Fair Housing Act.  My analysis is that Congress chose the term "handicap" to make sure that it is not confused with "disability" and to emphasize the much broader scope of "handicap".  To me the best way to understand this difference is to look at how "handicap" is defined in the U.S.  Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-142) where brilliant, high IQ kids are considered "handicapped" for purposes of needing special education.

§ 3602  Definitions.    As used in this subchapter--

(h)      "Handicap" means, with respect to a person--

(1)      a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities,

(2)      a record of having such an impairment, or

(3)      being regarded as having such an impairment,

but such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21).

= = = = = =

§ 3604.        Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices

As made applicable by section 3603 of this title and except as exempted by sections 3603 (b) and 3607 of this title, it shall be unlawful-


(f)      [ special rights of handicapped persons ]

        (1)       To discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of-

                    (A)      that buyer or renter,1

                    (B)      a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or

                    (C)      any person associated with that buyer or renter.

        (2)      To discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with such dwelling, because of a handicap of-

                    (A)      that person; or

                    (B)      a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or

                    (C)      any person associated with that person.

        (3)      For purposes of this subsection, discrimination includes-

                    (A)      a refusal to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises except that, in the case of a rental, the landlord may where it is reasonable to do so condition permission for a modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.1

                    (B)      a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling; or

                    (C)      [ dwellings first occupied post 13 March 1991 ] in connection with the design and construction of covered multifamily dwellings for first occupancy after the date that is 30 months after September 13, 1988, a failure to design and construct those dwellings in such a manner that-

                                (I)       the public use and common use portions of such dwellings are readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons;

                                (ii)      all the doors designed to allow passage into and within all premises within such dwellings are sufficiently wide to allow passage by handicapped persons in wheelchairs; and

                                (iii)    all premises within such dwellings contain the following features of adaptive design:

                                            (I)       an accessible route into and through the dwelling;

                                            (II)     light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats, and other environmental controls in accessible locations;

                                            (III)   reinforcements in bathroom walls to allow later installation of grab bars; and

                                            (IV)    usable kitchens and bathrooms such that an individual in a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.

        (4)      Compliance with the appropriate requirements of the American National Standard for buildings and facilities providing accessibility and usability for physically handicapped people (commonly cited as "ANSI A117.1") suffices to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (3)(C)(iii).

        (5)      (A)      If a State or unit of general local government has incorporated into its laws the requirements set forth in paragraph (3)(C), compliance with such laws shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of that paragraph.

                    (B)      A State or unit of general local government may review and approve newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings for the purpose of making determinations as to whether the design and construction requirements of paragraph (3)(C) are met.

                    (C)      The Secretary shall encourage, but may not require, States and units of local government to include in their existing procedures for the review and approval of newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings, determinations as to whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with paragraph (3)(C), and shall provide technical assistance to States and units of local government and other persons to implement the requirements of paragraph (3)(C).

                    (D)     Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require the Secretary to review or approve the plans, designs or construction of all covered multifamily dwellings, to determine whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with the requirements of paragraph 3(C).

        (6)      (A)      Nothing in paragraph (5) shall be construed to affect the authority and responsibility of the Secretary or a State or local public agency certified pursuant to section 3610 (f)(3) of this title to receive and process complaints or otherwise engage in enforcement activities under this subchap­ter.

                    (B)      Determinations by a State or a unit of general local government under paragraphs (5)(A) and (B) shall not be conclusive in enforcement proceedings under this subchap­ter.

        (7)      As used in this subsection, the term "covered multifamily dwellings" means-

                    (A)      buildings consisting of 4 or more units if such buildings have one or more elevators; and

                    (B)      ground floor units in other buildings consisting of 4 or more units.

        (8)      Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to invalidate or limit any law of a State or political subdivision of a State, or other jurisdiction in which this subchapter shall be effective, that requires dwellings to be designed and constructed in a manner that affords handicapped persons greater access than is required by this subchapter.

        (9)      Nothing in this subsection requires that a dwelling be made available to an individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in substantial physical damage to the property of others.

(Pub. L. 90-284, Title VIII, § 804, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 93-383, Title VIII, § 808(b)(1), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 100-430, §§ 6(a)-(b)(2), (e), 15, Sept. 13, 1988, 102 Stat. 1620, 1622, 1623, 1636.)

                                Marty
                                     C. Martin (Marty) Lawyer, III
                                     Florida Bar # 128095
                                     Bay Area Legal Services, Inc.
                                     1302  N. 19th St., Suite # 400
                                     Tampa,  FL 33605-5230
                                     (813)  232-1222, Ext.109
                                     FAX:  248-9922

                                       " Preserving  Independence,  Hope  and  Dignity "

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of David D Eastman
Sent: 12 December, 2013 11:03
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

These two guidance memoranda by HUD and the Department of Justice may provide good information and guidance to you.

David D. Eastman, Esq.
Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman, Gabel & Lee
2155 Delta Boulevard, Suite 210-B
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
(850) 521-0890
(850) 521-0891 Facsimile

The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  This transmission may be attorney-client work product or communication and as such is privileged and confidential.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and e-mail the original transmission to us.  Thank you.
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:51 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Thanks.

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40]

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases.

http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1

Harry

LAW OFFICES OF
HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.comhttp://www.evict.com/
Email: harry@evict.commailto:harry@evict.com
THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163


 11.    So in original.  The comma probably should be a semicolon.

 12.    So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.
My only addition to what others have said and cited is to emphasize that the "protected category" in the U.S. Fair Housing Act is not "disability". It is "handicap". The standards and rights in the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act are very different. I attach and paste below the operative provisions from the Fair Housing Act. My analysis is that Congress chose the term "handicap" to make sure that it is not confused with "disability" and to emphasize the much broader scope of "handicap". To me the best way to understand this difference is to look at how "handicap" is defined in the U.S. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-142) where brilliant, high IQ kids are considered "handicapped" for purposes of needing special education. § 3602 Definitions. As used in this subchapter-- (h) "Handicap" means, with respect to a person-- (1) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, (2) a record of having such an impairment, or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment, but such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21). = = = = = = § 3604. Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices As made applicable by section 3603 of this title and except as exempted by sections 3603 (b) and 3607 of this title, it shall be unlawful- * * * (f) [ special rights of handicapped persons ] (1) To discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of- (A) that buyer or renter,1 (B) a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or (C) any person associated with that buyer or renter. (2) To discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with such dwelling, because of a handicap of- (A) that person; or (B) a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or (C) any person associated with that person. (3) For purposes of this subsection, discrimination includes- (A) a refusal to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises except that, in the case of a rental, the landlord may where it is reasonable to do so condition permission for a modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.1 (B) a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling; or (C) [ dwellings first occupied post 13 March 1991 ] in connection with the design and construction of covered multifamily dwellings for first occupancy after the date that is 30 months after September 13, 1988, a failure to design and construct those dwellings in such a manner that- (I) the public use and common use portions of such dwellings are readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons; (ii) all the doors designed to allow passage into and within all premises within such dwellings are sufficiently wide to allow passage by handicapped persons in wheelchairs; and (iii) all premises within such dwellings contain the following features of adaptive design: (I) an accessible route into and through the dwelling; (II) light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats, and other environmental controls in accessible locations; (III) reinforcements in bathroom walls to allow later installation of grab bars; and (IV) usable kitchens and bathrooms such that an individual in a wheelchair can maneuver about the space. (4) Compliance with the appropriate requirements of the American National Standard for buildings and facilities providing accessibility and usability for physically handicapped people (commonly cited as "ANSI A117.1") suffices to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (3)(C)(iii). (5) (A) If a State or unit of general local government has incorporated into its laws the requirements set forth in paragraph (3)(C), compliance with such laws shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of that paragraph. (B) A State or unit of general local government may review and approve newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings for the purpose of making determinations as to whether the design and construction requirements of paragraph (3)(C) are met. (C) The Secretary shall encourage, but may not require, States and units of local government to include in their existing procedures for the review and approval of newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings, determinations as to whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with paragraph (3)(C), and shall provide technical assistance to States and units of local government and other persons to implement the requirements of paragraph (3)(C). (D) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require the Secretary to review or approve the plans, designs or construction of all covered multifamily dwellings, to determine whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with the requirements of paragraph 3(C). (6) (A) Nothing in paragraph (5) shall be construed to affect the authority and responsibility of the Secretary or a State or local public agency certified pursuant to section 3610 (f)(3) of this title to receive and process complaints or otherwise engage in enforcement activities under this subchap­ter. (B) Determinations by a State or a unit of general local government under paragraphs (5)(A) and (B) shall not be conclusive in enforcement proceedings under this subchap­ter. (7) As used in this subsection, the term "covered multifamily dwellings" means- (A) buildings consisting of 4 or more units if such buildings have one or more elevators; and (B) ground floor units in other buildings consisting of 4 or more units. (8) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to invalidate or limit any law of a State or political subdivision of a State, or other jurisdiction in which this subchapter shall be effective, that requires dwellings to be designed and constructed in a manner that affords handicapped persons greater access than is required by this subchapter. (9) Nothing in this subsection requires that a dwelling be made available to an individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in substantial physical damage to the property of others. (Pub. L. 90-284, Title VIII, § 804, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 93-383, Title VIII, § 808(b)(1), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 100-430, §§ 6(a)-(b)(2), (e), 15, Sept. 13, 1988, 102 Stat. 1620, 1622, 1623, 1636.) Marty C. Martin (Marty) Lawyer, III Florida Bar # 128095 Bay Area Legal Services, Inc. 1302 N. 19th St., Suite # 400 Tampa, FL 33605-5230 (813) 232-1222, Ext.109 FAX: 248-9922 " Preserving Independence, Hope and Dignity " From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of David D Eastman Sent: 12 December, 2013 11:03 To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule These two guidance memoranda by HUD and the Department of Justice may provide good information and guidance to you. David D. Eastman, Esq. Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman, Gabel & Lee 2155 Delta Boulevard, Suite 210-B Tallahassee, Florida 32303 (850) 521-0890 (850) 521-0891 Facsimile The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This transmission may be attorney-client work product or communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and e-mail the original transmission to us. Thank you. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:51 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Thanks. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 [cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases. http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1 Harry LAW OFFICES OF HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A. PH: 1 800 253 8428 FAX: 1 800 367 9038 "Serving the Property Management Professional" Website: www.evict.com<http://www.evict.com/> Email: harry@evict.com<mailto:harry@evict.com> THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY. ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 ________________________________ 11. So in original. The comma probably should be a semicolon. 12. So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.
CR
Carlos R. Arias
Thu, Dec 12, 2013 8:07 PM

Coincidentally, this article as just published today.  May want to keep an eye out for the sequel.

http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/condoblog/2013/12/will-condominium-no-pet-policies-become-obsolete.html

Best regards,

Carlos R. Arias
Clayton & McCulloh
1065 Maitland Center Commons Blvd.
Maitland, Florida 32751
Tel: (407)-875-2655
Fax: (407)-875-3363
Clayton & McCulloh now accepts credit cards.  Please go to www.clayton-mcculloh.comhttp://www.clayton-mcculloh.com/ and click on the "Online Payments" tab.
In compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please be advised that this law firm is acting as a debt collector and that the above mentioned may be attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.

From: Martin Lawyer [mailto:mlawyer@bals.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:56 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

My only addition to what others have said and cited is to emphasize that the "protected category" in the U.S. Fair Housing Act is not "disability".  It is "handicap".  The standards and rights in the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act are very different.

I attach and paste below the operative provisions from the Fair Housing Act.  My analysis is that Congress chose the term "handicap" to make sure that it is not confused with "disability" and to emphasize the much broader scope of "handicap".  To me the best way to understand this difference is to look at how "handicap" is defined in the U.S.  Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-142) where brilliant, high IQ kids are considered "handicapped" for purposes of needing special education.

§ 3602  Definitions.    As used in this subchapter--

(h)      "Handicap" means, with respect to a person--

(1)      a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities,

(2)      a record of having such an impairment, or

(3)      being regarded as having such an impairment,

but such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21).

= = = = = =

§ 3604.        Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices

As made applicable by section 3603 of this title and except as exempted by sections 3603 (b) and 3607 of this title, it shall be unlawful-


(f)      [ special rights of handicapped persons ]

        (1)       To discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of-

                    (A)      that buyer or renter,1

                    (B)      a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or

                    (C)      any person associated with that buyer or renter.

        (2)      To discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with such dwelling, because of a handicap of-

                    (A)      that person; or

                    (B)      a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or

                    (C)      any person associated with that person.

        (3)      For purposes of this subsection, discrimination includes-

                    (A)      a refusal to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises except that, in the case of a rental, the landlord may where it is reasonable to do so condition permission for a modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.1

                    (B)      a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling; or

                    (C)      [ dwellings first occupied post 13 March 1991 ] in connection with the design and construction of covered multifamily dwellings for first occupancy after the date that is 30 months after September 13, 1988, a failure to design and construct those dwellings in such a manner that-

                                (I)       the public use and common use portions of such dwellings are readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons;

                                (ii)      all the doors designed to allow passage into and within all premises within such dwellings are sufficiently wide to allow passage by handicapped persons in wheelchairs; and

                                (iii)    all premises within such dwellings contain the following features of adaptive design:

                                            (I)       an accessible route into and through the dwelling;

                                            (II)     light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats, and other environmental controls in accessible locations;

                                            (III)   reinforcements in bathroom walls to allow later installation of grab bars; and

                                            (IV)    usable kitchens and bathrooms such that an individual in a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.

        (4)      Compliance with the appropriate requirements of the American National Standard for buildings and facilities providing accessibility and usability for physically handicapped people (commonly cited as "ANSI A117.1") suffices to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (3)(C)(iii).

        (5)      (A)      If a State or unit of general local government has incorporated into its laws the requirements set forth in paragraph (3)(C), compliance with such laws shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of that paragraph.

                    (B)      A State or unit of general local government may review and approve newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings for the purpose of making determinations as to whether the design and construction requirements of paragraph (3)(C) are met.

                    (C)      The Secretary shall encourage, but may not require, States and units of local government to include in their existing procedures for the review and approval of newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings, determinations as to whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with paragraph (3)(C), and shall provide technical assistance to States and units of local government and other persons to implement the requirements of paragraph (3)(C).

                    (D)     Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require the Secretary to review or approve the plans, designs or construction of all covered multifamily dwellings, to determine whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with the requirements of paragraph 3(C).

        (6)      (A)      Nothing in paragraph (5) shall be construed to affect the authority and responsibility of the Secretary or a State or local public agency certified pursuant to section 3610 (f)(3) of this title to receive and process complaints or otherwise engage in enforcement activities under this subchap­ter.

                    (B)      Determinations by a State or a unit of general local government under paragraphs (5)(A) and (B) shall not be conclusive in enforcement proceedings under this subchap­ter.

        (7)      As used in this subsection, the term "covered multifamily dwellings" means-

                    (A)      buildings consisting of 4 or more units if such buildings have one or more elevators; and

                    (B)      ground floor units in other buildings consisting of 4 or more units.

        (8)      Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to invalidate or limit any law of a State or political subdivision of a State, or other jurisdiction in which this subchapter shall be effective, that requires dwellings to be designed and constructed in a manner that affords handicapped persons greater access than is required by this subchapter.

        (9)      Nothing in this subsection requires that a dwelling be made available to an individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in substantial physical damage to the property of others.

(Pub. L. 90-284, Title VIII, § 804, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 93-383, Title VIII, § 808(b)(1), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 100-430, §§ 6(a)-(b)(2), (e), 15, Sept. 13, 1988, 102 Stat. 1620, 1622, 1623, 1636.)

                                Marty

                                     C. Martin (Marty) Lawyer, III
                                     Florida Bar # 128095
                                     Bay Area Legal Services, Inc.
                                     1302  N. 19th St., Suite # 400
                                     Tampa,  FL 33605-5230
                                     (813)  232-1222, Ext.109
                                     FAX:  248-9922

                                       " Preserving  Independence,  Hope  and  Dignity "

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of David D Eastman
Sent: 12 December, 2013 11:03
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

These two guidance memoranda by HUD and the Department of Justice may provide good information and guidance to you.

David D. Eastman, Esq.
Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman, Gabel & Lee
2155 Delta Boulevard, Suite 210-B
Tallahassee, Florida 32303
(850) 521-0890
(850) 521-0891 Facsimile

The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above.  This transmission may be attorney-client work product or communication and as such is privileged and confidential.  If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited.  If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and e-mail the original transmission to us.  Thank you.
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:51 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Thanks.

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163

[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40]

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM
To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee'
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases.

http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1

Harry

LAW OFFICES OF
HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A.
PH: 1 800 253 8428
FAX: 1 800 367 9038
"Serving the Property Management Professional"
Website:  www.evict.comhttp://www.evict.com/
Email: harry@evict.commailto:harry@evict.com
THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY.  ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED.

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule

Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets".

Thanks.

Chuck Hoskin
Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon
30 South Spring Street
Pensacola, FL 32502

This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.commailto:choskin@esclaw.com) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you.

Charles P. Hoskin
Direct Dial:  850-444-3881
Fax:  850-434-7163



 11.    So in original.  The comma probably should be a semicolon.

 12.    So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.
Coincidentally, this article as just published today. May want to keep an eye out for the sequel. http://blogs.sun-sentinel.com/condoblog/2013/12/will-condominium-no-pet-policies-become-obsolete.html Best regards, Carlos R. Arias Clayton & McCulloh 1065 Maitland Center Commons Blvd. Maitland, Florida 32751 Tel: (407)-875-2655 Fax: (407)-875-3363 Clayton & McCulloh now accepts credit cards. Please go to www.clayton-mcculloh.com<http://www.clayton-mcculloh.com/> and click on the "Online Payments" tab. In compliance with the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, please be advised that this law firm is acting as a debt collector and that the above mentioned may be attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose. From: Martin Lawyer [mailto:mlawyer@bals.org] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 1:56 PM To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule My only addition to what others have said and cited is to emphasize that the "protected category" in the U.S. Fair Housing Act is not "disability". It is "handicap". The standards and rights in the U.S. Americans with Disabilities Act are very different. I attach and paste below the operative provisions from the Fair Housing Act. My analysis is that Congress chose the term "handicap" to make sure that it is not confused with "disability" and to emphasize the much broader scope of "handicap". To me the best way to understand this difference is to look at how "handicap" is defined in the U.S. Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-142) where brilliant, high IQ kids are considered "handicapped" for purposes of needing special education. § 3602 Definitions. As used in this subchapter-- (h) "Handicap" means, with respect to a person-- (1) a physical or mental impairment which substantially limits one or more of such person's major life activities, (2) a record of having such an impairment, or (3) being regarded as having such an impairment, but such term does not include current, illegal use of or addiction to a controlled substance (as defined in section 802 of Title 21). = = = = = = § 3604. Discrimination in the sale or rental of housing and other prohibited practices As made applicable by section 3603 of this title and except as exempted by sections 3603 (b) and 3607 of this title, it shall be unlawful- * * * (f) [ special rights of handicapped persons ] (1) To discriminate in the sale or rental, or to otherwise make unavailable or deny, a dwelling to any buyer or renter because of a handicap of- (A) that buyer or renter,1 (B) a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or (C) any person associated with that buyer or renter. (2) To discriminate against any person in the terms, conditions, or privileges of sale or rental of a dwelling, or in the provision of services or facilities in connection with such dwelling, because of a handicap of- (A) that person; or (B) a person residing in or intending to reside in that dwelling after it is so sold, rented, or made available; or (C) any person associated with that person. (3) For purposes of this subsection, discrimination includes- (A) a refusal to permit, at the expense of the handicapped person, reasonable modifications of existing premises occupied or to be occupied by such person if such modifications may be necessary to afford such person full enjoyment of the premises except that, in the case of a rental, the landlord may where it is reasonable to do so condition permission for a modification on the renter agreeing to restore the interior of the premises to the condition that existed before the modification, reasonable wear and tear excepted.1 (B) a refusal to make reasonable accommodations in rules, policies, practices, or services, when such accommodations may be necessary to afford such person equal opportunity to use and enjoy a dwelling; or (C) [ dwellings first occupied post 13 March 1991 ] in connection with the design and construction of covered multifamily dwellings for first occupancy after the date that is 30 months after September 13, 1988, a failure to design and construct those dwellings in such a manner that- (I) the public use and common use portions of such dwellings are readily accessible to and usable by handicapped persons; (ii) all the doors designed to allow passage into and within all premises within such dwellings are sufficiently wide to allow passage by handicapped persons in wheelchairs; and (iii) all premises within such dwellings contain the following features of adaptive design: (I) an accessible route into and through the dwelling; (II) light switches, electrical outlets, thermostats, and other environmental controls in accessible locations; (III) reinforcements in bathroom walls to allow later installation of grab bars; and (IV) usable kitchens and bathrooms such that an individual in a wheelchair can maneuver about the space. (4) Compliance with the appropriate requirements of the American National Standard for buildings and facilities providing accessibility and usability for physically handicapped people (commonly cited as "ANSI A117.1") suffices to satisfy the requirements of paragraph (3)(C)(iii). (5) (A) If a State or unit of general local government has incorporated into its laws the requirements set forth in paragraph (3)(C), compliance with such laws shall be deemed to satisfy the requirements of that paragraph. (B) A State or unit of general local government may review and approve newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings for the purpose of making determinations as to whether the design and construction requirements of paragraph (3)(C) are met. (C) The Secretary shall encourage, but may not require, States and units of local government to include in their existing procedures for the review and approval of newly constructed covered multifamily dwellings, determinations as to whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with paragraph (3)(C), and shall provide technical assistance to States and units of local government and other persons to implement the requirements of paragraph (3)(C). (D) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to require the Secretary to review or approve the plans, designs or construction of all covered multifamily dwellings, to determine whether the design and construction of such dwellings are consistent with the requirements of paragraph 3(C). (6) (A) Nothing in paragraph (5) shall be construed to affect the authority and responsibility of the Secretary or a State or local public agency certified pursuant to section 3610 (f)(3) of this title to receive and process complaints or otherwise engage in enforcement activities under this subchap­ter. (B) Determinations by a State or a unit of general local government under paragraphs (5)(A) and (B) shall not be conclusive in enforcement proceedings under this subchap­ter. (7) As used in this subsection, the term "covered multifamily dwellings" means- (A) buildings consisting of 4 or more units if such buildings have one or more elevators; and (B) ground floor units in other buildings consisting of 4 or more units. (8) Nothing in this subchapter shall be construed to invalidate or limit any law of a State or political subdivision of a State, or other jurisdiction in which this subchapter shall be effective, that requires dwellings to be designed and constructed in a manner that affords handicapped persons greater access than is required by this subchapter. (9) Nothing in this subsection requires that a dwelling be made available to an individual whose tenancy would constitute a direct threat to the health or safety of other individuals or whose tenancy would result in substantial physical damage to the property of others. (Pub. L. 90-284, Title VIII, § 804, Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 83; Pub. L. 93-383, Title VIII, § 808(b)(1), Aug. 22, 1974, 88 Stat. 729; Pub. L. 100-430, §§ 6(a)-(b)(2), (e), 15, Sept. 13, 1988, 102 Stat. 1620, 1622, 1623, 1636.) Marty C. Martin (Marty) Lawyer, III Florida Bar # 128095 Bay Area Legal Services, Inc. 1302 N. 19th St., Suite # 400 Tampa, FL 33605-5230 (813) 232-1222, Ext.109 FAX: 248-9922 " Preserving Independence, Hope and Dignity " From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of David D Eastman Sent: 12 December, 2013 11:03 To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule These two guidance memoranda by HUD and the Department of Justice may provide good information and guidance to you. David D. Eastman, Esq. Lutz, Bobo, Telfair, Eastman, Gabel & Lee 2155 Delta Boulevard, Suite 210-B Tallahassee, Florida 32303 (850) 521-0890 (850) 521-0891 Facsimile The information contained in this transmission is intended only for the personal and confidential use of the designated recipient(s) named above. This transmission may be attorney-client work product or communication and as such is privileged and confidential. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that you have received this document in error, and any review, dissemination, distribution, or copying of the contents of this information is strictly prohibited. If you received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone and e-mail the original transmission to us. Thank you. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 10:51 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Thanks. This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 [cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Heist, Weisse & Wolk Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:24 AM To: 'RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee' Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Here is an article by Robin Hein of Georgia who litigates many of these cases. http://www.evict.com/?page=legnew1309#fhhein1 Harry LAW OFFICES OF HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A. PH: 1 800 253 8428 FAX: 1 800 367 9038 "Serving the Property Management Professional" Website: www.evict.com<http://www.evict.com/> Email: harry@evict.com<mailto:harry@evict.com> THIS E-MAIL MESSAGE IS CONFIDENTIAL, ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGED, AND INTENDED FOR THE PERSONS NAMED ABOVE ONLY. ALL OTHER USE, COPYING, OR DISTRIBUTION IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED. From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Chuck Hoskin Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 9:46 AM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] ADA versus "no pets" rule Does anyone have any insight on a tenant's request under the Fair Housing law and ADA (post traumatic stress) for a "therapy dog" in an apartment complex that is "no pets". Thanks. Chuck Hoskin Emmanuel Sheppard & Condon 30 South Spring Street Pensacola, FL 32502 This e-mail message and all attachments transmitted with it may contain legally privileged and confidential information intended solely for the use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any reading, dissemination, distribution, copying, or other use of this message or its attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please notify the sender immediately by telephone (850-433-6581) or by electronic mail (choskin@esclaw.com<mailto:choskin@esclaw.com>) and then delete[cid:image001.png@01CE0382.09E1FC40] this message and all copies and backups thereof. Thank you. Charles P. Hoskin Direct Dial: 850-444-3881 Fax: 850-434-7163 ________________________________ ________________________________ 11. So in original. The comma probably should be a semicolon. 12. So in original. The period probably should be a semicolon.