I'm for seeking to have the RPPTL lobbyist actively oppose this. I know we
need a subcommittee vote and then we need to run it through legislative but
for all the reasons Harry set out this is a BAD policy to get started and
the REQUIREMENT that it be offered to tenants is a huge headache. My
primary client looked into hiring a company that offered this type of
product and we didn't in large part because of this offering- it was
complicated and not really good for the tenants in the long run. It also
did not really provide adequate protection to the Landlords because
COLLECTING against the "security" is not an easy task either- it is much
more difficult than holding a security deposit and impressing a lien.
As the. session is basically here- if we do want to oppose this is now
urgent since there are a lot of hoops we need to jump through to authorize
the section lobbyist to lobby.
Deborah
Deborah Marks, PLLC
18495 S. Dixie Highway
Ste 134
Miami, FL 33157
305-372-9400
deborahmarkslaw@gmail.com
deborah@deborahmarks.law
synergy928@aol.com
On Fri, Nov 12, 2021 at 11:05 AM Real Estate Leasing Committee <
landtencl@lists.flabarrpptl.org> wrote:
Legislation such as this is being pushed by the security deposit
alternative companies such as Obligo, Rhino, and Assurant. It is already
in place in some cities and counties outside of Florida and in some cases,
it is mandatory that the landlord must allow an alternative.
The public is very confused by these products and it is a mess. Some are
insurance products. Some bonds. Many property managers use the
established companies but many want to charge fees in lieu of deposits on
their own and they are pocketing the money and in some cases, they charge
for example $150 a month in perpetuity, through renewals, instead of a
$1000 security deposit upfront. This results in a LARGE profit to the
property manager, the property owner has no clue it is going on, and most
likely this is an unfair and deceptive trade practice or possibly is
“insurance”. The property managers are in essence creating their own
insurance product for the $1000. If there is $1000 in loss to the owner,
the property manager pays it but pockets the difference collected.
I sent an email about this issue a while back but nobody seemed
interested. Here is a helpful article written by a property manager which
explains how some work:
https://www.peterlohmann.com/blog/security-deposit-alternatives-tenant-screening-innovation
Unless this is written up correctly, it could really create a situation
where a tenant is taken advantage of all under the guise of helping them
not have to pay a large deposit upfront.
The creation of many guarantees, pet damage protection, eviction
protection, rent loss protection by the property manager is spreading
rapidly due to some loudmouths on social media who have concocted these
money making schemes. I contacted the FLOIR (Florida Office of Insurance
Regulation) and they told me it is insurance and they wanted me to name
names which of course I would not do. The property managers think that is
they do not call something “insurance”, then they are in the clear. I see
some class actions on the way. There are way too many fees that are not
being disclosed until an applicant pays money, gets approved, is bound to
sign a lease, and is ready to sign the lease. That is false advertising,
bait and switch and no different than the Resort Fee cases which made a lot
of lawyers a lot of money.
Harry Heist
*CDC ORDER HAS BEEN STRUCK DOWN BY THE SUPREME COURT *
*INFO ON CARES COVERED PROPERTY: *
https://evict.com/?page=cares_act_update
*LAW OFFICES OF HEIST, WEISSE & WOLK P.A.PH: 1 800 253 8428FAX: 1 800 367
9038"Serving the Property Management Professional"Website: *
www.evict.com http://www.evict.com/
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org <
landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> *On Behalf Of *RPPTL Real Estate
Leasing Committee
Sent: Thursday, November 11, 2021 11:00 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org;
RPPTL Landlord Tennant Committee landtencl@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Cc: Trey Goldman treyg@floridarealtors.org; Marcia Tabak <
marciat@floridarealtors.org>
Subject: Re: [RPPTL Leasing Committee] LL/T Legislation - HB 537
Dear Leasing Committee:
Trey Goldman from Florida Realtors and the RREIL committee has provided
the information below on HB 537: Fees in Lieu of Security Deposits (filed
11/8/21). Also note the information on a similar law that was passed in
Texas.
Bill Summary/Link:
“Fees in Lieu of Security Deposits; Authorizes landlord to offer tenant
option to pay fee in lieu of security deposit; requires landlord to provide
certain written notice to tenant; requires written agreement signed by
landlord, or landlord's agent, & tenant if tenant decides to pay fee in
lieu of security deposit; requires specified disclosure in written
agreement; provides options for paying fee; specifies that fee is not
security deposit; requires landlord to offer option to pay fee in lieu of
security deposit to all new tenants; provides exception.”
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/537
I know this will certainly be of interest to the committee. We will
monitor this at the committee level but if anyone is of the opinion we need
to do more than that or would like to provide feedback to Trey, please do
voice your comments.
Thank you
Kristen King Jaiven, Esq.
General Counsel
The Signature Real Estate Companies
Ph: 561.705.0140
Direct Line: 561-300-6921
Email: Kristen@quadcompanies.com
www.SignatureRealEstateCompanies.com
http://www.signaturerealestatecompanies.com/
[image: Signature Partners] http://mysignaturenetwork.com/
On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 8:37 PM Trey Goldman treyg@floridarealtors.org
wrote:
Hi Kristen.
Was nice seeing you at the meetings last week.
Here’s the bill I mentioned -
https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2022/537. The Leasing Committee may
totally pass on, and I won’t be offended. Just sharing.
The language that passed in Texas is very different than language filed in
Florida -
https://capitol.texas.gov/BillLookup/History.aspx?LegSess=87R&Bill=SB1783
– but intent is the same.
Let me know if you have any questions.
Trey Goldman
Legislative Counsel | Florida
*Realtors®*200 South Monroe Street, Tallahassee, FL 32301
talk: 850.224.1400 x2505
*direct: *850.521.3277
visit: http://www.floridarealtors.org
http://www.floridarealtors.org/
Click link to learn more about: Legal Hotline
https://www.floridarealtors.org/tools-research/legal-hotline| Tech
Helpline https://www.floridarealtors.org/tools-research/tech-helpline | Form
Simplicity https://www.formsimplicity.com/floridarealtorsmemberbenefit
SunStats
https://www.floridarealtors.org/tools-research/reports/sunstats-custom-interactive-florida-housing-market-reports
| News https://www.floridarealtors.org/news-media/florida-realtors-news
| Magazine https://www.floridarealtors.org/magazine | Advocacy
https://www.floridarealtors.org/advocacy | Online Ed
https://www.floridarealtors.org/education
Facebook: http://floridarealtors.org/facebook
Twitter: http://floridarealtors.org/twitter
The Voice for Real Estate in Florida
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
If you have received this email in error please notify the system manager.
Please note that any views or opinions presented in this email are solely
those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of the company.
Finally, the recipient should check this email and any attachments for the
presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused
by any virus transmitted by this email. Quad Realty Investments, Inc. d/b/a
The Signature Real Estate Companies 6699 N Federal Hwy, Suite 103, Boca
Raton, FL 33487 Email Abuse Reporting: it@quadcompanies.com
LandTenCL mailing list
LandTenCL@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/landtencl