Dear Adele, Trey, and members of the Leasing Committee,
Art Menor sent the Leasing Committee a California legislative history and California Assemble legislation deals with abandonment of commercial property. The California legislation allows a landlord of commercial property to give notice of belief of abandonment where the rent has been due and unpaid for at least the number of days required for the landlord to declare tenant default under the terms of the lease, but in no case less than three days
Art asked that we look at the California legislation and see if can be addressed in Sect 83.05. The sub- committee has looked at it and drafted language appropriate to Florida. Sect 83.05 has been left intact and the new language has been added.
The new language would benefit commercial landlords in that it would allow a landlord to take possession of the property sooner and give certainty to whether the property has been abandoned. Please review and comments are welcome. Thanks. Arlene
[cid:image001.png@01D50E63.86AD8E90]
Arlene C. Udick, Esq.
(p) 352-391-1888
(c) 352-217-3176
This office is closed on Fridays.
Although our Firm is strictly residential I saw that the service of the "landlord's notice" was "two postal days".
two postal days after deposit in the U.S. mails by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the tenant at the tenant's last known address
Likewise, for the tenant notice to the landlord.
two postal days after deposit in the U.S. mails by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the address that landlord provided for such purpose in the notice of belief of abandonment.
Lastly, don't get me wrong. I represent landlords, so support whatever can be done to accelerate possession of the premises and removal of tenant property That said, will a court have a due process issue by requiring a tenant to give a legally binding address for service of process in order to protect his rights to his own property. Would this be viewed as the landlord bettering his position under the threat of a statutorily protected abandonment?
Just some thoughts.
Mike
Michael Geo. F. Davis
Attorney at Law
The MGFD Law Firm PA
Countryside Colonial Center
2753 SR 580, Suite 209
Clearwater, FL 33761-3351
P 727-726-1900
F 727-726-7440
mike@mgfdlaw.com
Primary Eservice: eservice@mgfdlaw.com
The information transmitted is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any review, retransmissions, dissemination or other use of this information by persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) is unauthorized and prohibited. Any transmission of confidential and/or privileged material to persons or entities other than the intended recipient(s) shall not be construed as a waiver of any privilege or confidence. If you receive this transmission in error, please contact the sender and delete the material. Thank you.
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org On Behalf Of Arlene Udick
Sent: Sunday, May 19, 2019 5:15 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org; Stone, Adele Adele.Stone@bipc.com; Trey Goldman treyg@floridarealtors.org
Cc: skfrazier@hwhlaw.com; mike@heartlandlaw.com
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Amendment to Section 83.05 FS
Dear Adele, Trey, and members of the Leasing Committee,
Art Menor sent the Leasing Committee a California legislative history and California Assemble legislation deals with abandonment of commercial property. The California legislation allows a landlord of commercial property to give notice of belief of abandonment where the rent has been due and unpaid for at least the number of days required for the landlord to declare tenant default under the terms of the lease, but in no case less than three days
Art asked that we look at the California legislation and see if can be addressed in Sect 83.05. The sub- committee has looked at it and drafted language appropriate to Florida. Sect 83.05 has been left intact and the new language has been added.
The new language would benefit commercial landlords in that it would allow a landlord to take possession of the property sooner and give certainty to whether the property has been abandoned. Please review and comments are welcome. Thanks. Arlene
[cid:image001.png@01D50F22.D0FCF0C0]
Arlene C. Udick, Esq.
(p) 352-391-1888
(c) 352-217-3176
This office is closed on Fridays.