From: Gibbons, Michael [mailto:Michael.Gibbons@lowndes-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Bruce Partington
Subject: Bond coverage

Good question Bruce.  My thoughts:

1.  Take a look at Phoenix Indemnity v. Board of Public Instruction

of Alachua County, 114 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).  The Phoenix
Indemnity court held that the contractor's surety bond was liable for
payment of insurance premiums not paid by contractor despite contractor
having an express contractual obligation to make the premium payments.
Not exactly your claim but close and certainly gets at the obvious issue
that your claim is not for completion of the bricks and mortar (which
every surety lawyer wants to limit the surety bond coverage to).

2.  Is there an issue of who suffered the damage and the operation

of the mutual waiver of subrogation clauses doubtlessly present in the
contracts at issue?  Could not tell in your summary but I believe this
may be an issue.  If the GC had insurance coverage for the claim (which
it sounds like) and would simply like to have the sub's policy be
primary on the loss, then there may be an issue with actual damages
suffered by GC (given the presence of insurance).  Also, if the loss
falls on the carrier, depending on the operation and breadth of the
mutual waiver of subro language, there may not be any subrogation rights
arising out of the loss (especially a property loss).

3. Is there an issue re operation of a mutual waiver of
   consequential damages provision in the incorporated subcontract (either
   directly or by reference or incorporation of the prime contract
   documents)?  Not clear whether the category of damages being claimed
   would fall into the "consequential damages" bucket but it sounds like
   that might be the case.

4. The AIA A 312 bond form is broad in scope and contains some
   favorable language for the obligee.  Without knowing all the facts, it
   sounds like there may be a colorable claim if some of the above raised
   concerns are addressed (as well as others which I have failed to
   identify).

Good luck.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio
http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons )

Shareholder

Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.

450 South Orange Avenue, 8th Floor

Orlando, FL 32801

Phone: 407-418-6378

Fax: 407-843-4444

email: michael.gibbons@lowndes-law.com

website: http://www.lowndes-law.com

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the
attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information
and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information
which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise
confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an
addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such
recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction,
re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail
communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly
prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail
communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance
either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately
delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all
physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or
other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for
"spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply
or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e.,
potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching
us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply
or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the
same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending
communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive
by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that
this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may
contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax
issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230)
require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that,
unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not
written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the
addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties
imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting,
marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the)
transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein.
Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with
respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s)
addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its
particular circumstances. [v4.30]

Does anyone know of a case that would estop a surety from relying on the
SOL to defeat a subcontractor claim when it denied (in writing) that a
bond was in place during the SOL period?

Tracye K. Solove, Attorney at Law

Certified Civil Circuit Mediator

Tracye@solovelawfirm.com

Kendallwood Office Park One

12002 Southwest 128th Court

Suite 201

Miami, Florida  33186

Phone: (305) 612-0800

Facsimile: (305) 612-0801

http://www.solovelawfirm.com http://www.solovelawfirm.com/

Providing Statewide Legal Services in the areas of Commercial
Collections and Recovery, Creditors' Rights, Commercial Landlord/Tenant
and Real Estate Foreclosures

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named
addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential,
proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If
this notification is received by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s), the recipient(s) should immediately notify the undersigned
by E-MAIL and by telephone and obtain instructions as to the disposal of
the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used,
copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) except with the express written consent of the sender.
Thank you.

From: constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
Bruce Partington
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:31 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: Bond coverage

From: Gibbons, Michael [mailto:Michael.Gibbons@lowndes-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Bruce Partington
Subject: Bond coverage

Good question Bruce.  My thoughts:

1.  Take a look at Phoenix Indemnity v. Board of Public Instruction

of Alachua County, 114 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).  The Phoenix
Indemnity court held that the contractor's surety bond was liable for
payment of insurance premiums not paid by contractor despite contractor
having an express contractual obligation to make the premium payments.
Not exactly your claim but close and certainly gets at the obvious issue
that your claim is not for completion of the bricks and mortar (which
every surety lawyer wants to limit the surety bond coverage to).

2.  Is there an issue of who suffered the damage and the operation

of the mutual waiver of subrogation clauses doubtlessly present in the
contracts at issue?  Could not tell in your summary but I believe this
may be an issue.  If the GC had insurance coverage for the claim (which
it sounds like) and would simply like to have the sub's policy be
primary on the loss, then there may be an issue with actual damages
suffered by GC (given the presence of insurance).  Also, if the loss
falls on the carrier, depending on the operation and breadth of the
mutual waiver of subro language, there may not be any subrogation rights
arising out of the loss (especially a property loss).

3. Is there an issue re operation of a mutual waiver of
   consequential damages provision in the incorporated subcontract (either
   directly or by reference or incorporation of the prime contract
   documents)?  Not clear whether the category of damages being claimed
   would fall into the "consequential damages" bucket but it sounds like
   that might be the case.

4. The AIA A 312 bond form is broad in scope and contains some
   favorable language for the obligee.  Without knowing all the facts, it
   sounds like there may be a colorable claim if some of the above raised
   concerns are addressed (as well as others which I have failed to
   identify).

Good luck.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio
http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons )

Shareholder

Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.

450 South Orange Avenue, 8th Floor

Orlando, FL 32801

Phone: 407-418-6378

Fax: 407-843-4444

email: michael.gibbons@lowndes-law.com

website: http://www.lowndes-law.com

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the
attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information
and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information
which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise
confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an
addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such
recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction,
re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail
communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly
prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail
communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance
either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately
delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all
physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or
other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for
"spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply
or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e.,
potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching
us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply
or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the
same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending
communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive
by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that
this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may
contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax
issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230)
require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that,
unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not
written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the
addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties
imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting,
marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the)
transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein.
Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with
respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s)
addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its
particular circumstances. [v4.30]

If the lienor requested a copy of the bond from the contractor or owner
and did not receive one, then the lienor may have rights against them
for failure to provide a copy, but that will not excuse the lienor's
failure to timely perfect its claim against the surety.  Bridgeport,
Inc. v. Tampa Roofing Co. (Fla. 2d DCA 2005); Bridgeport, Inc. v. Rinker
Materials Corp., 849 So. 2d 1193 (Fla. 4th DCA 2003); Mursten Const. Co.
v. C.E.S. Industries, Inc., 588 So. 2d 1061 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991).

Lee A. Weintraub
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.
Emerald Lake Corporate Park
3111 Stirling Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312-6525

954.985.4147 Phone
954.985.4176 Fax

LWeintraub@becker-poliakoff.com
http://www.becker-poliakoff.com

Our clients' total satisfaction is our #1 priority. The Becker & Poliakoff Client CARE Center is available for questions, concerns and suggestions. Please contact us at 954.364.6090 or via email at CARE@becker-poliakoff.com. 

Go to http://www.floridaconstructionlawauthority.com/ to subscribe to our complimentary Florida Construction Law Blog.

From: constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
Tracye
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:58 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Public Project Bond and SOL

Does anyone know of a case that would estop a surety from relying on the
SOL to defeat a subcontractor claim when it denied (in writing) that a
bond was in place during the SOL period?

Tracye K. Solove, Attorney at Law

Certified Civil Circuit Mediator

Tracye@solovelawfirm.com

Kendallwood Office Park One

12002 Southwest 128th Court

Suite 201

Miami, Florida  33186

Phone: (305) 612-0800

Facsimile: (305) 612-0801

http://www.solovelawfirm.com http://www.solovelawfirm.com/

Providing Statewide Legal Services in the areas of Commercial
Collections and Recovery, Creditors' Rights, Commercial Landlord/Tenant
and Real Estate Foreclosures

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named
addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential,
proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If
this notification is received by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s), the recipient(s) should immediately notify the undersigned
by E-MAIL and by telephone and obtain instructions as to the disposal of
the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used,
copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) except with the express written consent of the sender.
Thank you.

From: constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of
Bruce Partington
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:31 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: Bond coverage

From: Gibbons, Michael [mailto:Michael.Gibbons@lowndes-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Bruce Partington
Subject: Bond coverage

Good question Bruce.  My thoughts:

1.  Take a look at Phoenix Indemnity v. Board of Public Instruction

of Alachua County, 114 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).  The Phoenix
Indemnity court held that the contractor's surety bond was liable for
payment of insurance premiums not paid by contractor despite contractor
having an express contractual obligation to make the premium payments.
Not exactly your claim but close and certainly gets at the obvious issue
that your claim is not for completion of the bricks and mortar (which
every surety lawyer wants to limit the surety bond coverage to).

2.  Is there an issue of who suffered the damage and the operation

of the mutual waiver of subrogation clauses doubtlessly present in the
contracts at issue?  Could not tell in your summary but I believe this
may be an issue.  If the GC had insurance coverage for the claim (which
it sounds like) and would simply like to have the sub's policy be
primary on the loss, then there may be an issue with actual damages
suffered by GC (given the presence of insurance).  Also, if the loss
falls on the carrier, depending on the operation and breadth of the
mutual waiver of subro language, there may not be any subrogation rights
arising out of the loss (especially a property loss).

3. Is there an issue re operation of a mutual waiver of
   consequential damages provision in the incorporated subcontract (either
   directly or by reference or incorporation of the prime contract
   documents)?  Not clear whether the category of damages being claimed
   would fall into the "consequential damages" bucket but it sounds like
   that might be the case.

4. The AIA A 312 bond form is broad in scope and contains some
   favorable language for the obligee.  Without knowing all the facts, it
   sounds like there may be a colorable claim if some of the above raised
   concerns are addressed (as well as others which I have failed to
   identify).

Good luck.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio
http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons )

Shareholder

Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.

450 South Orange Avenue, 8th Floor

Orlando, FL 32801

Phone: 407-418-6378

Fax: 407-843-4444

email: michael.gibbons@lowndes-law.com

website: http://www.lowndes-law.com

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the
attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information
and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information
which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise
confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an
addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such
recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction,
re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail
communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly
prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail
communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance
either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately
delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all
physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or
other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for
"spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply
or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e.,
potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching
us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply
or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the
same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending
communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive
by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that
this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may
contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax
issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230)
require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that,
unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not
written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the
addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties
imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting,
marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the)
transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein.
Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with
respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s)
addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its
particular circumstances. [v4.30]

These were 255.05 bonds which were recorded. When we sent our letter to
the surety indicating that we intended to look to the bonds, the surety
responded by telling us that the bonds were withdrawn, with permission
of the public entity. If the bonds are found to be in place, can the
surety rely on the SOL to defeat the subcontractor's claim?

Tracye K. Solove, Attorney at Law

Certified Civil Circuit Mediator

Tracye@solovelawfirm.com

Kendallwood Office Park One

12002 Southwest 128th Court

Suite 201

Miami, Florida  33186

Phone: (305) 612-0800

Facsimile: (305) 612-0801

http://www.solovelawfirm.com http://www.solovelawfirm.com/

Providing Statewide Legal Services in the areas of Commercial
Collections and Recovery, Creditors' Rights, Commercial Landlord/Tenant
and Real Estate Foreclosures

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named
addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential,
proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If
this notification is received by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s), the recipient(s) should immediately notify the undersigned
by E-MAIL and by telephone and obtain instructions as to the disposal of
the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used,
copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) except with the express written consent of the sender.
Thank you.

From: constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Greg
Elliott
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 10:21 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Public Project Bond and SOL

public work (255.05 or 337.18 bond), or private work (713.23 or 24)?

Gregory T. Elliott
ELLIOTT - BERGER, P. A.
10225 Ulmerton Road, Suite 4A
Largo, Florida 33771
(727) 360-2600 (Phone)
(727) 360-6588 (Fax)
Board Certified In Construction Law

NOTICE OF CONFIDENTIALITY: This message and its attachments are intended
solely for the use of the addressee. In addition, this message and the
attachments may contain information that is confidential, privileged and
exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the intended
recipient of this message, you are prohibited from reading, disclosing,
reproducing, distributing, disseminating or otherwise using this
transmission. Delivery of this message to any person other than the
intended recipient is not intended to waive any right or privilege. If
you have received this message in error, please promptly notify the
sender by reply E-mail and immediately delete this message from your
system.

On 4/19/2012 9:57 AM, Tracye wrote:

Does anyone know of a case that would estop a surety from relying on the
SOL to defeat a subcontractor claim when it denied (in writing) that a
bond was in place during the SOL period?

Tracye K. Solove, Attorney at Law

Certified Civil Circuit Mediator

Tracye@solovelawfirm.com

Kendallwood Office Park One

12002 Southwest 128th Court

Suite 201

Miami, Florida  33186

Phone: (305) 612-0800

Facsimile: (305) 612-0801

http://www.solovelawfirm.com http://www.solovelawfirm.com/

Providing Statewide Legal Services in the areas of Commercial
Collections and Recovery, Creditors' Rights, Commercial Landlord/Tenant
and Real Estate Foreclosures

This transmission is intended to be delivered only to the named
addressee(s) and may contain information which is confidential,
proprietary, attorney work-product or attorney-client privileged. If
this notification is received by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s), the recipient(s) should immediately notify the undersigned
by E-MAIL and by telephone and obtain instructions as to the disposal of
the transmitted material. In no event shall this material be read, used,
copied, reproduced, stored or retained by anyone other than the intended
recipient(s) except with the express written consent of the sender.
Thank you.

From: constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [
mailto:constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Bruce
Partington
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2012 9:31 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] FW: Bond coverage

From: Gibbons, Michael [mailto:Michael.Gibbons@lowndes-law.com]
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 6:36 PM
To: Bruce Partington
Subject: Bond coverage

Good question Bruce.  My thoughts:

1.  Take a look at Phoenix Indemnity v. Board of Public Instruction

of Alachua County, 114 So. 2d 478 (Fla. 1st DCA 1959).  The Phoenix
Indemnity court held that the contractor's surety bond was liable for
payment of insurance premiums not paid by contractor despite contractor
having an express contractual obligation to make the premium payments.
Not exactly your claim but close and certainly gets at the obvious issue
that your claim is not for completion of the bricks and mortar (which
every surety lawyer wants to limit the surety bond coverage to).

2.  Is there an issue of who suffered the damage and the operation

of the mutual waiver of subrogation clauses doubtlessly present in the
contracts at issue?  Could not tell in your summary but I believe this
may be an issue.  If the GC had insurance coverage for the claim (which
it sounds like) and would simply like to have the sub's policy be
primary on the loss, then there may be an issue with actual damages
suffered by GC (given the presence of insurance).  Also, if the loss
falls on the carrier, depending on the operation and breadth of the
mutual waiver of subro language, there may not be any subrogation rights
arising out of the loss (especially a property loss).

3. Is there an issue re operation of a mutual waiver of
   consequential damages provision in the incorporated subcontract (either
   directly or by reference or incorporation of the prime contract
   documents)?  Not clear whether the category of damages being claimed
   would fall into the "consequential damages" bucket but it sounds like
   that might be the case.

4. The AIA A 312 bond form is broad in scope and contains some
   favorable language for the obligee.  Without knowing all the facts, it
   sounds like there may be a colorable claim if some of the above raised
   concerns are addressed (as well as others which I have failed to
   identify).

Good luck.

Michael R. Gibbons  (Bio
http://lowndes-law.com/our-people/michael-r-gibbons )

Shareholder

Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.

450 South Orange Avenue, 8th Floor

Orlando, FL 32801

Phone: 407-418-6378

Fax: 407-843-4444

email: michael.gibbons@lowndes-law.com

website: http://www.lowndes-law.com

Notice of Confidentiality: This e-mail communication and the
attachment(s) hereto, if any, are intended solely for the information
and use of the addressee(s) identified above and may contain information
which is legally privileged from disclosure and/or otherwise
confidential. If a recipient of this e-mail communication is not an
addressee (or an authorized representative of an addressee), such
recipient is hereby advised that any review, disclosure, reproduction,
re-transmission or other dissemination or use of this e-mail
communication (or any information contained herein) is strictly
prohibited. If you are not an addressee and have received this e-mail
communication in error, please advise the sender of that circumstance
either by reply e-mail or by telephone at (800) 356-6818, immediately
delete this e-mail communication from any computer and destroy all
physical copies of same.

Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or
other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for
"spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply
or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e.,
potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching
us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply
or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the
same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending
communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive
by means other than e-mail.

Notice Under U.S. Treasury Department Circular 230: To the extent that
this e-mail communication and the attachment(s) hereto, if any, may
contain written advice concerning or relating to a Federal (U.S.) tax
issue, United States Treasury Department Regulations (Circular 230)
require that we (and we do hereby) advise and disclose to you that,
unless we expressly state otherwise in writing, such tax advice is not
written or intended to be used, and cannot be used by you (the
addressee), or other person(s), for purposes of (1) avoiding penalties
imposed under the United States Internal Revenue Code or (2) promoting,
marketing or recommending to any other person(s) the (or any of the)
transaction(s) or matter(s) addressed, discussed or referenced herein.
Each taxpayer should seek advice from an independent tax advisor with
respect to any Federal tax issue(s), transaction(s) or matter(s)
addressed, discussed or referenced herein based upon his, her or its
particular circumstances. [v4.30]

constructionlaw mailing list
constructionlaw@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw

Any recommendations for a Central Florida (Orlando preferably) consultant to help assess a home to prepare a 558 claim?  Mostly general construction issues but some structural, no electrical or HVAC.

Thanks

Greg

Gregory J. Johansen

Gregory J. Johansen P.A.

4767 New Broad Street

Orlando FL 32814

407-956-1050

407-514-2604 (fax)

gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.com

To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35), we

inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.

NOTE: This e-mail is from Gregory J. Johansen, P.A., and is intended for the recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to Gregory J. Johansen, P.A. that you expect to be confidential.

If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

Paul Gidus

Sent from my iPhone

On May 18, 2012, at 10:31 AM, "Gregory Johansen" <gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.commailto:gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.com> wrote:

Any recommendations for a Central Florida (Orlando preferably) consultant to help assess a home to prepare a 558 claim?  Mostly general construction issues but some structural, no electrical or HVAC.

Thanks

Greg

Gregory J. Johansen
Gregory J. Johansen P.A.
4767 New Broad Street
Orlando FL 32814

407-956-1050
407-514-2604 (fax)

gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.commailto:gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.com

To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35), we
inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.

NOTE: This e-mail is from Gregory J. Johansen, P.A., and is intended for the recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to Gregory J. Johansen, P.A. that you expect to be confidential.
If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

constructionlaw mailing list
constructionlaw@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:constructionlaw@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw

Roger Repstein. He is a licensed architect, professional engineer and general contractor (407) 830-6522

From: constructionlaw-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org on behalf of Curtis Brown
Sent: Fri 5/18/2012 10:40 AM
To: RPPTL constructionlaw
Subject: Re: [RPPTL-constructionlaw] Consultant to assist with Chapter 558 claim

Paul Gidus

Sent from my iPhone

On May 18, 2012, at 10:31 AM, "Gregory Johansen" <gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.commailto:gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.com> wrote:

Any recommendations for a Central Florida (Orlando preferably) consultant to help assess a home to prepare a 558 claim?  Mostly general construction issues but some structural, no electrical or HVAC.

Thanks

Greg

Gregory J. Johansen
Gregory J. Johansen P.A.
4767 New Broad Street
Orlando FL 32814

407-956-1050
407-514-2604 (fax)

gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.commailto:gregoryjohansen@gjjlaw.com

To ensure compliance with Treasury Regulations (31 CFR Part 10, Sec. 10.35), we
inform you that any tax advice contained in this correspondence was not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used by you or anyone else, for the purpose of avoiding penalties imposed by the Internal Revenue Code.

NOTE: This e-mail is from Gregory J. Johansen, P.A., and is intended for the recipient(s)only. If you received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete the e-mail and do not copy or disclose it. If you are not an existing client, do not construe anything in this e-mail to make you a client unless it contains a specific statement to that effect and do not disclose anything to Gregory J. Johansen, P.A. that you expect to be confidential.
If you properly received this e-mail as a client, co-counsel or retained expert, you should maintain its contents in confidence to preserve the attorney-client or work product privilege.

constructionlaw mailing list
constructionlaw@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:constructionlaw@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw

constructionlaw mailing list
constructionlaw@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/constructionlaw