landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org

RPPTL Real Estate Leasing Committee

View all threads

[RPPTL LandTen] "Allocation of Security Deposit" as a cause of action/remedy in claim for security deposit

GP
George Pincus
Thu, Dec 9, 2010 6:52 PM

One of my colleagues asked me if I had ever heard of "Allocation of Security Deposit" as a cause of action in a claim for security deposit in a residential case (we represent the Tenant who is trying to get back a sizable security deposit).

I was not familiar with "allocation" as a remedy in a claim for a security deposit.  Can anyone shed any light on this one for me?

Thanks.

George A. Pincus, Esq.
Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler
Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.
New River Center, Suite 2100
200 East Las Olas Boulevard
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301
Telephone: 954-766-9705
Facsimile:    954-766-9719
E-mail: gpincus@stearnsweaver.commailto:gpincus@swmwas.com
www.stearnsweaver.com


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this E-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.


CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.

One of my colleagues asked me if I had ever heard of "Allocation of Security Deposit" as a cause of action in a claim for security deposit in a residential case (we represent the Tenant who is trying to get back a sizable security deposit). I was not familiar with "allocation" as a remedy in a claim for a security deposit. Can anyone shed any light on this one for me? Thanks. George A. Pincus, Esq. Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. New River Center, Suite 2100 200 East Las Olas Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: 954-766-9705 Facsimile: 954-766-9719 E-mail: gpincus@stearnsweaver.com<mailto:gpincus@swmwas.com> www.stearnsweaver.com ________________________________ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this E-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. ________________________________ CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.
JM
Jeffrey Mazor
Thu, Dec 9, 2010 7:44 PM

George:

How would  that be different from a action for  return of all the security
deposit  where the Plaintiff just acknowledges a limitation on the extent of
the claim?

Jeff

Jeffrey R. Mazor, Esq.

J. R. Mazor & Associates, P.A.

Presidential Circle Building

4000 Hollywood Blvd.,  Suite 265-s

Hollywood, FL 33021

Phone: 954-962-3500

Fax:      954-962-3560

Email:  Jmazor@Mazor.com

From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of George Pincus
Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:53 PM
To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org'
Cc: Farah Rajani
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] "Allocation of Security Deposit" as a cause of
action/remedy in claim for security deposit

One of my colleagues asked me if I had ever heard of "Allocation of Security
Deposit" as a cause of action in a claim for security deposit in a
residential case (we represent the Tenant who is trying to get back a
sizable security deposit).

I was not familiar with "allocation" as a remedy in a claim for a security
deposit.  Can anyone shed any light on this one for me?

Thanks.

George A. Pincus, Esq.

Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler

Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A.

New River Center, Suite 2100

200 East Las Olas Boulevard

Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301

Telephone: 954-766-9705

Facsimile:    954-766-9719

E-mail: gpincus@stearnsweaver.com mailto:gpincus@swmwas.com

www.stearnsweaver.com


CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this E-mail message is
attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use
of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination,
distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you
have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by
reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you.


CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with recently-enacted U.S.
Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that,
unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in
this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written by
us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the purpose of avoiding
federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for
promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related
matters addressed herein.

George: How would that be different from a action for return of all the security deposit where the Plaintiff just acknowledges a limitation on the extent of the claim? Jeff Jeffrey R. Mazor, Esq. J. R. Mazor & Associates, P.A. Presidential Circle Building 4000 Hollywood Blvd., Suite 265-s Hollywood, FL 33021 Phone: 954-962-3500 Fax: 954-962-3560 Email: Jmazor@Mazor.com From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of George Pincus Sent: Thursday, December 09, 2010 1:53 PM To: 'landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org' Cc: Farah Rajani Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] "Allocation of Security Deposit" as a cause of action/remedy in claim for security deposit One of my colleagues asked me if I had ever heard of "Allocation of Security Deposit" as a cause of action in a claim for security deposit in a residential case (we represent the Tenant who is trying to get back a sizable security deposit). I was not familiar with "allocation" as a remedy in a claim for a security deposit. Can anyone shed any light on this one for me? Thanks. George A. Pincus, Esq. Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson, P.A. New River Center, Suite 2100 200 East Las Olas Boulevard Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Telephone: 954-766-9705 Facsimile: 954-766-9719 E-mail: gpincus@stearnsweaver.com <mailto:gpincus@swmwas.com> www.stearnsweaver.com _____ CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this E-mail message is attorney privileged and confidential information intended only for the use of the individual(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copy of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please contact the sender by reply E-mail and destroy all copies of the original message. Thank you. _____ CIRCULAR 230 DISCLOSURE: To ensure compliance with recently-enacted U.S. Treasury Department Regulations, we are now required to advise you that, unless otherwise expressly indicated, any federal tax advice contained in this communication, including any attachments, is not intended or written by us to be used, and cannot be used, by anyone for the purpose of avoiding federal tax penalties that may be imposed by the federal government or for promoting, marketing or recommending to another party any tax-related matters addressed herein.