ST
Steve Thompson
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 6:04 PM
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
RJ
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 6:51 PM
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the original message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
AC
Arlene C. Udick
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 7:16 PM
718.203 FS - the condo statute - provides different warranties and time periods from the developer to the purchaser of a unit. I have also heard about the 1 year warranty from a builder to the owner of a residential parcel, but have not seen any statutory authority. My guess is that might be something the builder gives to the owner directly as part of his business practice. Arlene
Arlene C. Udick, Esq.
Of Counsel
Bogin, Munns & Munns P.A.
8564 E. County Road 466, Ste. 305
The Villages, FL 32162
Tel: (352) 391-6031
Fax: (352) 751-3645
www.BoginMunns.com
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
718.203 FS - the condo statute - provides different warranties and time periods from the developer to the purchaser of a unit. I have also heard about the 1 year warranty from a builder to the owner of a residential parcel, but have not seen any statutory authority. My guess is that might be something the builder gives to the owner directly as part of his business practice. Arlene
Arlene C. Udick, Esq.
Of Counsel
Bogin, Munns & Munns P.A.
8564 E. County Road 466, Ste. 305
The Villages, FL 32162
Tel: (352) 391-6031
Fax: (352) 751-3645
www.BoginMunns.com
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
L
lan (at) lwwhiteattorney.com
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 7:45 PM
You have the statutory condominium warranties in 718.203. Other than that,
I don't know of a statute either. It has been in the AIA forms (and now
ConsensusDocs) for so long it has hardened from a contract option through
usual to required.
Regards,
Lan White
(727) 797-5599
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J.
Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found
no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within
the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential
information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained
expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work
product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this
message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of
the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender
and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received
in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail
and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in
and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm,
cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are
not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional
materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and
is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used
for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF
THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE
OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE
MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION
OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
You have the statutory condominium warranties in 718.203. Other than that,
I don't know of a statute either. It has been in the AIA forms (and now
ConsensusDocs) for so long it has hardened from a contract option through
usual to required.
Regards,
Lan White
(727) 797-5599
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J.
Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found
no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within
the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential
information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained
expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work
product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this
message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of
the attorney-client privilege. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended
recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination,
distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender
and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications
Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received
in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail
and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in
and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm,
cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are
not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional
materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and
is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used
for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF
THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE
OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE
MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION
OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
LE
Lohrer, Edward
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 7:49 PM
To the best of my knowledge only condominiums (associations, owners &
developers) have statutory construction warranty rights in Florida (The
UCC also provides some warranties but these can be difficult to apply to
a construction setting).
Unless express, all other construction related warranties come from
common law. There was an article written in the Florida Bar Journal a
few years back that does a good job of giving a general overview of
Florida warranties in the construction setting ( let me know if the link
doesn't work and I can give you a cite).
http://www.floridabar.org/divcom/jn/jnjournal01.nsf/Subjects/031A209353C
755C385257589006E95FE
Edward C. Lohrer
Attorney at Law
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.
Emerald Lake Corporate Park
3111 Stirling Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312-6525
954.987.7550 Phone
954.985.4176 Fax
ELohrer@becker-poliakoff.com
http://www.becker-poliakoff.com
Our clients' total satisfaction is our #1 priority. The Becker & Poliakoff Client CARE Center is available for questions, concerns and suggestions. Please contact us at 954.364.6090 or via email at CARE@becker-poliakoff.com.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that
residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most
of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety
bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a
requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a
citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
To the best of my knowledge only condominiums (associations, owners &
developers) have statutory construction warranty rights in Florida (The
UCC also provides some warranties but these can be difficult to apply to
a construction setting).
Unless express, all other construction related warranties come from
common law. There was an article written in the Florida Bar Journal a
few years back that does a good job of giving a general overview of
Florida warranties in the construction setting ( let me know if the link
doesn't work and I can give you a cite).
http://www.floridabar.org/divcom/jn/jnjournal01.nsf/Subjects/031A209353C
755C385257589006E95FE
Edward C. Lohrer
Attorney at Law
Board Certified Construction Lawyer
Becker & Poliakoff, P.A.
Emerald Lake Corporate Park
3111 Stirling Road
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312-6525
954.987.7550 Phone
954.985.4176 Fax
ELohrer@becker-poliakoff.com
http://www.becker-poliakoff.com
Our clients' total satisfaction is our #1 priority. The Becker & Poliakoff Client CARE Center is available for questions, concerns and suggestions. Please contact us at 954.364.6090 or via email at CARE@becker-poliakoff.com.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that
residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most
of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e. liens and surety
bond
claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a
requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a
citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
WD
Willis, David
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 8:08 PM
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation
Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese
J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have
found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named
within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and
confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a
client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the
attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended
recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party,
that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might
constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we
apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete
the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall,
in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the
sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this
firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax
penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any
marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector
and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be
used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that
residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the
owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not
see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a
citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE
OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM
THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS
MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED
WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO
FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS
CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation
Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese
J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have
found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named
within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and
confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a
client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the
attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended
recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party,
that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the
agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are
hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying
of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might
constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18
U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we
apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete
the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall,
in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the
sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this
firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax
penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any
marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector
and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be
used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that
residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the
owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not
see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a
citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE
OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM
THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS
MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED
WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO
FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS
CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
EK
Ed Kinberg
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 8:23 PM
Same with me, but most of the residential contracts I read have a one year warranty.
ed
ED KINBERG
FELLOW, NATIONAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
BOARD CERTIFIED, CONSTRUCTION LAW ATTORNEY
Government Contract Law, Construction Law, and Business Law
Attorneys At Law
1290 W. Eau Gallie Boulevard
Melbourne, FL 32935
Tel. (321) 259-1910
Fax (321) 259-1996
www.kblegal.com
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return the original to us by mail without making a copy. Thank you.
Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis, David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
Same with me, but most of the residential contracts I read have a one year warranty.
ed
ED KINBERG
FELLOW, NATIONAL CONTRACT MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION
BOARD CERTIFIED, CONSTRUCTION LAW ATTORNEY
Government Contract Law, Construction Law, and Business Law
Attorneys At Law
1290 W. Eau Gallie Boulevard
Melbourne, FL 32935
Tel. (321) 259-1910
Fax (321) 259-1996
www.kblegal.com
This message is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to which it is addressed, and may contain information that is PRIVILEGED, CONFIDENTIAL and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the employee or agent responsible for delivering the message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by telephone, and return the original to us by mail without making a copy. Thank you.
Replies Filtered: Any incoming reply to this e-mail communication or other e-mail communication to us will be electronically filtered for "spam" and/or "viruses." That filtering process may result in such reply or other e-mail communications to us being quarantined (i.e., potentially not received at our site at all) and/or delayed in reaching us. For that reason, we cannot guarantee that we will receive your reply or other e-mail communications to us and/or that we will receive the same in a timely manner. Accordingly, you should consider sending communications to us which are particularly important or time-sensitive by means other than e-mail.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis, David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
JT
John Trawick
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 8:38 PM
It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and...well, you know. Pure urban legend.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDA30F.89E9CBD0]
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis, David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.commailto:Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and...well, you know. Pure urban legend.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDA30F.89E9CBD0]
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis, David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]<mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]> On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com<mailto:Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com>
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]<mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]> On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CI
Chris Iseley
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 8:58 PM
Like Reese, I have been asked the same question numerous times. It is always fun trying to prove something does NOT exist. Have a great weekend all.
Christopher J. Iseley
Board Certified in Construction Law
Franson & Iseley, P.A.
1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 100
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Telephone: (904) 396-1800
Facsimile: (904) 396-1804
ciseley@fi-law.com
Franson & Iseley, P.A. E-Mail Confidentiality Notice
This transmission may be: (1) subject to the attorney -client privilege; (2) attorney work product; or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this information in error, please reply, notify the sender, and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal law.
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of John Trawick
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:39 PM
To: Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and...well, you know. Pure urban legend.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDA31A.A3B5F2E0]
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis, David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.commailto:Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
Like Reese, I have been asked the same question numerous times. It is always fun trying to prove something does NOT exist. Have a great weekend all.
Christopher J. Iseley
Board Certified in Construction Law
Franson & Iseley, P.A.
1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 100
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Telephone: (904) 396-1800
Facsimile: (904) 396-1804
ciseley@fi-law.com
Franson & Iseley, P.A. E-Mail Confidentiality Notice
This transmission may be: (1) subject to the attorney -client privilege; (2) attorney work product; or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or disseminate this information. If you have received this information in error, please reply, notify the sender, and delete the message. Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal law.
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of John Trawick
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:39 PM
To: Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and...well, you know. Pure urban legend.
[cid:image001.jpg@01CDA31A.A3B5F2E0]
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org> [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis, David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk & Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]<mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]> On Behalf Of Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com<mailto:Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com>
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section 2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm, cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]<mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]> On Behalf Of Steve Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
ST
Steve Thompson
Fri, Oct 5, 2012 9:28 PM
Thank you all for the many helpful responses. Had no idea this would
generate such a response.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
From: Chris Iseley [mailto:CIseley@FI-LAW.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:58 PM
To: John Trawick; Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: RE: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Like Reese, I have been asked the same question numerous times. It is
always fun trying to prove something does NOT exist. Have a great weekend
all.
Christopher J. Iseley
Board Certified in Construction Law
Franson & Iseley, P.A.
1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 100
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Telephone: (904) 396-1800
Facsimile: (904) 396-1804
ciseley@fi-law.com
Franson & Iseley, P.A. E-Mail Confidentiality Notice
This transmission may be: (1) subject to the attorney -client privilege;
(2) attorney work product; or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
disseminate this information. If you have received this information in
error, please reply, notify the sender, and delete the message.
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal law.
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of John
Trawick
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:39 PM
To: Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from
rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and.well, you know. Pure
urban legend.
Description: cid:62762185-b1e0-4780-a697-a3a667c17288@exg5.exghost.com
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis,
David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk
& Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J.
Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found
no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: mailto:Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within
the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential
information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained
expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work
product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this
message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of
the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a
violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section
2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the
intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in
and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm,
cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are
not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional
materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and
is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used
for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see
such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF
THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE
OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE
MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION
OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
CLC-Discussion mailing list
mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
CLC-Discussion mailing list
mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
Thank you all for the many helpful responses. Had no idea this would
generate such a response.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL
AND PRIVILEGED COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED
RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION
IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE
AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE OFFICE OF THE ERROR;
AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE MAY NOT
BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER
DISTRIBUTION OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS
WITHOUT THE EXPRESS CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_____
From: Chris Iseley [mailto:CIseley@FI-LAW.com]
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:58 PM
To: John Trawick; Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: RE: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Like Reese, I have been asked the same question numerous times. It is
always fun trying to prove something does NOT exist. Have a great weekend
all.
Christopher J. Iseley
Board Certified in Construction Law
Franson & Iseley, P.A.
1650 Prudential Drive, Suite 100
Jacksonville, Florida 32207
Telephone: (904) 396-1800
Facsimile: (904) 396-1804
ciseley@fi-law.com
Franson & Iseley, P.A. E-Mail Confidentiality Notice
This transmission may be: (1) subject to the attorney -client privilege;
(2) attorney work product; or (3) strictly confidential. If you are not the
intended recipient of this message, you may not disclose, print, copy or
disseminate this information. If you have received this information in
error, please reply, notify the sender, and delete the message.
Unauthorized interception of this e-mail is a violation of federal law.
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of John
Trawick
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 4:39 PM
To: Willis, David; Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
It's like syringe needles in payphones, kidney thieves, birds exploding from
rice at weddings, Pop Rocks & Coke, Rod Stewart and.well, you know. Pure
urban legend.
Description: cid:62762185-b1e0-4780-a697-a3a667c17288@exg5.exghost.com
-----Original Message-----
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Willis,
David
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 3:09 PM
To: Reese J. Henderson, Jr.; Steve Thompson;
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve,
You are not alone.
David C. Willis
Board Certified in Construction Law and Business Litigation Rumberger, Kirk
& Caldwell, P.A.
407.839.2186
-----Original Message-----
From: <mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
<mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Reese J.
Henderson, Jr.
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:51 PM
To: 'Steve Thompson'; <mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Steve: I've been asked this question probably 20-30 times and I have found
no evidence that such a statute exists.
Reese J. Henderson, Jr.
Board Certified Construction Attorney
GrayRobinson, P.A.
50 North Laura Street, Suite 1100
P.O. Box
Jacksonville, Florida 32202
Main: 904-598-9929 | Fax: 904-598-9109
Email: <mailto:Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com>
Reese.Henderson@gray-robinson.com
This e-mail is intended only for the individual(s) or entity(s) named within
the message. This e-mail might contain legally privileged and confidential
information. If you properly received this e-mail as a client or retained
expert, please hold it in confidence to protect the attorney-client or work
product privileges. Should the intended recipient forward or disclose this
message to another person or party, that action could constitute a waiver of
the attorney-client privilege.
If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or the agent
responsible to deliver it to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
that any review, dissemination, distribution or copying of this
communication is prohibited by the sender and to do so might constitute a
violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. section
2510-2521. If this communication was received in error we apologize for the
intrusion. Please notify us by reply e-mail and delete the origin!
al message without reading same. Nothing in this e-mail message shall, in
and of itself, create an attorney-client relationship with the sender.
Disclaimer under Circular 230: Any statements regarding tax matters made
herein, including any attachments, are not formal tax opinions by this firm,
cannot be relied upon or used by any person to avoid tax penalties, and are
not intended to be used or referred to in any marketing or promotional
materials.
Please be advised that this law firm may be acting as a debt collector and
is attempting to collect a debt and any information provided will be used
for that purpose.
-----Original Message-----
From: <mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org
<mailto:[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org]>
[mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Thompson
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 2:05 PM
To: <mailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Residential contractor warranty
Hello folks,
I have a relative who is a residential contractor. He made
reference to what he believed was a statutory requirement that residential
builders provide a warranty of a minimum of one year to the owner. Most of
my practice involves commercial payment issues (i.e.
liens and surety bond claims). I reviewed Fl. Stat. ch 558 but did not see
such a requirement.
Is anyone aware of such a statute and, if so, could you provide a citation?
Thank you very much.
Steven F. Thompson, Esq.
Thompson & Brooks
412 E. Madison St., Ste 900
Tampa, Fl. 33602
813-387-1821
Fax 813-387-1824
THE ABOVE MAY CONTAIN OR CONSTITUTE A CONFIDENTIAL AND PRIVILEGED
COMMUNICATION. IF YOU ARE NOT THE INTENDED RECIPIENT, OR IF YOU HAVE
OTHERWISE RECEIVED THIS COMMUNICATION IN ERROR, PLEASE NOTIFY THE OFFICE OF
THOMPSON & BROOKS BY TELEPHONE AT (813) 387-1821 [collect] AND INFORM THE
OFFICE OF THE ERROR; AND PLEASE DESTROY OR DELETE THIS MESSAGE. THIS MESSAGE
MAY NOT BE REVIEWED, PRINTED, DISPLAYED, OR RE-TRANSMITTED WITHOUT THE
SENDER'S CONSENT. ALL RIGHTS PROTECTED. THERE MAY BE NO FURTHER DISTRIBUTION
OR PUBLICATION OF THIS COMMUNICATION OR ITS CONTENTS WITHOUT THE EXPRESS
CONSENT OF THOMPSON & BROOKS. THANK YOU.
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
_______________________________________________
CLC-Discussion mailing list
<mailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org>
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
<http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion>
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
