Everyone,
I represent an engineering firm which is a consultant to a water authority ("owner"). The authority wants the engineering firm to (i) include legal services (contract drafting and review) in its scope of work (ii) hire an owner-designated attorney as a subconsultant to perform these services. [I have asked why the owner can not look to the owner's current attorney or hire its designated attorney directly to perform these services; apparently there are political reasons for not doing so.] It seems to me that the engineering firm will have problems including legal services in its scope of work even though the legal services are to be performed by an attorney under contract as a subconsultant to the firm. Some possible problems:
Richard A. Burt, Esq.
BURT & BURT
220 So. Ridgewood Avenue
Suite 200
Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
(386) 252-2090 (office)
(866) 240-7043 (facsimile)
dick@burt-burt.commailto:dick@burt-burt.com
www.burt-burt.comhttp://www.burt-burt.com/
There used to be a segment on Saturday Night Live called "Bad Idea Jeans.' That fits your scenario.
If you check with the Bar UPL committee you will find that this won't work.
Your other concerns are also valid.
Larry R. Leiby, Esq.
Malka & Kravitz, P.A.
1300 Sawgrass Corp. Pkwy., Suite 100
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33323
Phone: 954-514-0984
Fax: 954-514-0985 e-mail: leiby@mkpalaw.com
Board Certified in Construction Law
Fla. Supreme Court Certified Circuit Court Civil Mediator
Member, Leiby Alexander Brandt ADR Group, LLC
Member, JAMS Global Engineering and Construction Panel
Fellow, College of Commercial Arbitrators
[cid:image001.jpg@01CE36C2.14EAA380]
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Richard A. Burt
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 2:24 PM
To: Construction Law Committee (clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org)
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Engineer furnishing legal services
Everyone,
I represent an engineering firm which is a consultant to a water authority ("owner"). The authority wants the engineering firm to (i) include legal services (contract drafting and review) in its scope of work (ii) hire an owner-designated attorney as a subconsultant to perform these services. [I have asked why the owner can not look to the owner's current attorney or hire its designated attorney directly to perform these services; apparently there are political reasons for not doing so.] It seems to me that the engineering firm will have problems including legal services in its scope of work even though the legal services are to be performed by an attorney under contract as a subconsultant to the firm. Some possible problems:
Richard A. Burt, Esq.
BURT & BURT
220 So. Ridgewood Avenue
Suite 200
Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
(386) 252-2090 (office)
(866) 240-7043 (facsimile)
dick@burt-burt.commailto:dick@burt-burt.com
www.burt-burt.comhttp://www.burt-burt.com/
I concur with Larry. No brainer. How can you hire a non lawyer to provide legal services?
Sent from my iPhone
On Apr 11, 2013, at 2:52 PM, "Larry Leiby" <Leiby@mkpalaw.commailto:Leiby@mkpalaw.com> wrote:
There used to be a segment on Saturday Night Live called “Bad Idea Jeans.’ That fits your scenario.
If you check with the Bar UPL committee you will find that this won’t work.
Your other concerns are also valid.
Larry R. Leiby, Esq.
Malka & Kravitz, P.A.
1300 Sawgrass Corp. Pkwy., Suite 100
Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33323
Phone: 954-514-0984
Fax: 954-514-0985 e-mail: leiby@mkpalaw.commailto:leiby@mkpalaw.com
Board Certified in Construction Law
Fla. Supreme Court Certified Circuit Court Civil Mediator
Member, Leiby Alexander Brandt ADR Group, LLC
Member, JAMS Global Engineering and Construction Panel
Fellow, College of Commercial Arbitrators
<image001.jpg>
From: clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:clc-discussion-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Richard A. Burt
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2013 2:24 PM
To: Construction Law Committee (clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:clc-discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org)
Subject: [CLC-Discussion] Engineer furnishing legal services
Everyone,
I represent an engineering firm which is a consultant to a water authority (“owner”). The authority wants the engineering firm to (i) include legal services (contract drafting and review) in its scope of work (ii) hire an owner-designated attorney as a subconsultant to perform these services. [I have asked why the owner can not look to the owner’s current attorney or hire its designated attorney directly to perform these services; apparently there are political reasons for not doing so.] It seems to me that the engineering firm will have problems including legal services in its scope of work even though the legal services are to be performed by an attorney under contract as a subconsultant to the firm. Some possible problems:
Richard A. Burt, Esq.
BURT & BURT
220 So. Ridgewood Avenue
Suite 200
Daytona Beach, Florida 32114
(386) 252-2090 (office)
(866) 240-7043 (facsimile)
dick@burt-burt.commailto:dick@burt-burt.com
www.burt-burt.comhttp://www.burt-burt.com/
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com
CLC-Discussion mailing list
CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:CLC-Discussion@lists.flabarrpptl.org
http://mailman.fsr.com/mailman/listinfo/clc-discussion
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
For more information please visit http://www.symanteccloud.com