Adrienne
ADRIENNE F.PROMOFF, P.A.
Museum Tower * Penthouse II
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2950
Miami, Florida 33l30
Tel: 305- 374-0102 Fax: 305-692-3086
Email: apromoff@mindspring.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Leonard Cabral
Sent: Apr 20, 2015 8:04 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-PortalPREFIX = "[default] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" NS = "http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40" /<ZZZ!--
/* Font Definitions /
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Tahoma;
panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/ Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:ZZZlink, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
span.EmailStyle18
{mso-style-type:personal-reply;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";
color:black;
font-weight:normal;
font-style:normal;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-size:10.0pt;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
-->prefix = "o" /I believe you are incorrect unless I am missing something (please tell me I am missing something). I looked it up and it is very confusing (to me anyway). Judicial Rule 2.516 (b)(1)(D) Time of Service. Service by e-mail is complete on the date it is sent. But then look directly below and there it is, 2.516 (b)(1)(D)(iii) E-mail service, including e-service, is treated as service by mail for the computation of time.Believe me I cannot make this sh** up.
Leonard P. Cabral, Esq.
Please disregard inadvertent misspellings and the use of abbreviations.
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Anthony J. Horky
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:17 PM
To: landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-PortalService on the opposing party or 10 days to file the motion? I believe that for filing, the day you efile it through the portal is considered filed. Not five days after efiling.
Sent from Anthony Horky's mobile email
From: Leonard Cabral
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 5:30 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Reply To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-Portal
On a motion for reconsideration the time to do so is 10 days. e-Service is treated as service by mail for the computation of time. So am I correct that the time to file reconsideration is reduced to 5 days? Has anyone faced this before? Is there any way around this?
Leonard P. Cabral, Esq.
212 N. Park Ave. Ste. 14
Sanford, FL 32771
Please disregard inadvertent misspellings
Thanks, I agree and would never challenge the mail rule but I have a real PAIN in MY BUTT as opposing counsel that will muddy the waters with anything he can so in anticipation of an objection for the untimely reconsideration I also faxed it to him which the mail rule does not apply. Served when received.
Leonard P. Cabral, Esq.
Leonardcabral@lenslaw.com
Please disregard inadvertent misspellings and the use of abbreviations.
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Adrienne F. Promoff
Sent: Tuesday, April 21, 2015 10:12 AM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee; RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-Portal
My opinion- Consider it served by eservice without the additional 5 days-- I think this is in the process of being confirmed by Rule- if not completed already-- check with the probate/guardianship/trust committees because we just discussed this in Orlando.
Adrienne
ADRIENNE F.PROMOFF, P.A.
Museum Tower * Penthouse II
150 West Flagler Street, Suite 2950
Miami, Florida 33l30
Tel: 305- 374-0102 Fax: 305-692-3086
Email: apromoff@mindspring.commailto:apromoff@mindspring.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Leonard Cabral
Sent: Apr 20, 2015 8:04 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-Portal
I believe you are incorrect unless I am missing something (please tell me I am missing something). I looked it up and it is very confusing (to me anyway). Judicial Rule 2.516 (b)(1)(D) Time of Service. Service by e-mail is complete on the date it is sent. But then look directly below and there it is, 2.516 (b)(1)(D)(iii) E-mail service, including e-service, is treated as service by mail for the computation of time.
Believe me I cannot make this sh** up.
Leonard P. Cabral, Esq.
Leonardcabral@lenslaw.commailto:Leonardcabral@lenslaw.com
Please disregard inadvertent misspellings and the use of abbreviations.
From: landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org [mailto:landten-bounces@lists.flabarrpptl.org] On Behalf Of Anthony J. Horky
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 7:17 PM
To: landten@lists.flabarrpptl.orgmailto:landten@lists.flabarrpptl.org
Subject: Re: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-Portal
Service on the opposing party or 10 days to file the motion? I believe that for filing, the day you efile it through the portal is considered filed. Not five days after efiling.
Sent from Anthony Horky's mobile email
From: Leonard Cabral
Sent: Monday, April 20, 2015 5:30 PM
To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Reply To: RPPTL Landlord Tenant Committee
Subject: [RPPTL LandTen] Service by E-Portal
On a motion for reconsideration the time to do so is 10 days. e-Service is treated as service by mail for the computation of time. So am I correct that the time to file reconsideration is reduced to 5 days? Has anyone faced this before? Is there any way around this?
Leonard P. Cabral, Esq.
Leonardcabral@lenslaw.commailto:Leonardcabral@lenslaw.com
212 N. Park Ave. Ste. 14
Sanford, FL 32771
Please disregard inadvertent misspellings